Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:25

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
President Xi Jinping Speaks with U.S. President Donald J. Trump on the Phone - fmprc.gov.cn
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Qualcomm to acquire semiconductor firm Alphawave Semi for $2.4B - TechCrunch
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
What are the top AI business ideas for beginners?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Mets to call up Max Kranick to take Kodai Senga's roster spot - SNY
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Firefly's Blue Ghost On Moon Seen By Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter - MSN
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.